|
A Special Interest Casualty
Phony arguments wreck a
working cross-border
trucking program
Mexico
has retaliated against the United States by imposing tariffs on
90 products — including toilet paper — due to President Obama’s
canceling a one- year study allowing Mexican trucks to deliver
cargo beyond the pre-NAFTA 20 mile commercial border zone. A
NAFTA clause calls for allowing the three partner nations
commercial truck access into each others country. Canadian
trucks were given immediate access to U.S. highways, but in the case of Mexico, as is
all too often the case, it was denied equal access through
accusations of inferior safety trucking and driver standards.
Both Canadian and Mexican trucks would have access to deliver
goods to specific destinations only, and either return empty or
pick up from those specific destinations. This is not an open
invitation to compete with local haulers.
Yet fear is
a powerful tool. It is used very effectively against
Mexico
by special interests groups fearing loss of competitive
advantages enjoyed at the expense of consumers or simply by
nativists who cringe at the words Mexican or
Mexico. The accusation finds
guilt without necessity of proof. This is what happened here.
None of the
accusations on what would happen during the one year study
proved correct. Those who claimed “American men, women and
children will be killed by Mexican trucks” and “They have no
laws and have inferior equipment placing Americans in harms way”
were proved wrong.
This left
both extreme right wing nativists and those dependent on union
wages or political contributions fuming. But it wasn’t enough to
keep the program going. So once again, the U.S. breaks its word, feeding fuel to those
throughout Latin America who
see the nation as a bully.
Mexico
is hailed for standing up to the “bully” by imposing tariffs on
many products as it is allowed under the NAFTA agreement.
The
trucking issue was never truly a safety issue. The California
Highway Patrol opened state of the art facilities at commercial
ports of entry to inspect trucks. The CHP is harsh on trucks and
drivers not in compliance, be they Mexican or not. The safety
record of Mexican trucks in the program surpassed those of
domestic carriers. While some suggest Mexican trucks got off
easier, that is both a lie and an insult to the CHP. The
California
program is a model for other states.
The sad
part is that there are bona fide reasons for the
United States
to sit with Mexico
and discuss legitimate concerns regarding allowing Mexican
trucks on U.S. highways.
The potential for both human and drug smuggling from
Mexico, and drugs from
Canada
(oh yes, they also come in from there), is very real.
The issue
begged for a cooperative approach. Already there are agreements
in place allowing for inspection of trucks at points of
departures. So how could these agreements be further expanded?
The United States
could have worked with
Mexico
to enhance the flow of goods between our two countries with
added safety measures.
Unfortunately when policy is dictated by special interests and
accusations flow with no points of fact, both nations lose. It
is not in the best interest of the United States, nor for its national
security, to have adversary relationships with our next door
neighbor. It is not in Mexico’s
interest to have an adversary relationship with the United States, the world’s leading
economy.
Sadly our
country’s special interest groups don’t care, so long as their
interests are protected.
Hopefully, this month’s visit to
Mexico
by President Obama, following up on Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton’s trip, can bring about a long lasting solution and
improvement in our bilateral relationship with
Mexico. Who cares what the
special interest groups think of that.
Patrick Osio Jr. can be
reached at posiojr@aol.com.
The veteran consultant has participated on writing scripts for
documentaries on
Baja California
real estate, medical services, and retirement information at
TransBorderCommunications.com.
This article first appeared on the April
2009 issue of the San Diego Metropolitan Magazine.
|