|
The following report was written, revised and submitted by:
Manuel Hernández, Erika Robles and Burt Posner to the National Hispanic/
Latino American and Migrant Agenda
This report is the culmination of numerous hours of hard work by the
members of the committee. After a series of regional meetings and a national
conference, which was held in
Chicago last June, the report was voted on
and approved by the Summit participants. Recommendations are made at the end
of the report. The report will be included in its entirety.
Part Two:
The reauthorization of child nutrition programs which includes the National
School Lunch Program is a top priority for Hispanic/Latinos in this country.
Some of these programs are the only meals that millions of children depend
on to eat during the day. The present proposals seek to greatly undermine
this program by imposing new needs criteria that will result in a
substantial decrease of children who need this program for their sustenance.
Education funding in the past year has seen a decrease that does not take
into account the severe ramifications such level of spending has on the
increased enrollment of Hispanic/Latino students. The No Child Left Behind
Act has drastically changed the federal bilingual program from a competitive
to a state formula which is assumed to reach an increased amount of needy
schools that use English language learners program (ELL). There has been a
tremendous amount of disconcertion regarding the present level of federal
funding committed to this program and it is recommended that the bill be
revisited and scrutinized for a possible funding formula increase.
No program sets the life theme for education for young children of
disadvantaged Hispanic/Latino families as the Federal Head Start program.
Unfortunately, the lack of funding for this program in migrant workers’
communities has impacted very unfavorably on the pre-school children of this
important constituency of the Hispanic/Latino community. Furthermore, there
has been an insidious attempt to disqualify large number of pre- school
students from this program by imposing arduous and unreasonable testing
standards.
School vouchers which will permit parents to apply for annual grants which
will allow them to send their children to a school of their choice is very
popular among Hispanic/Latino parents but not among those involved in school
administration.
It is a subject that carries merit on both sides of the fence since we need
to insure that public education does not suffer due to the filtering away of
much needed funds especially to underserved school districts. However, the
tilt toward the acceptance of school vouchers lies in the indisputable fact
that no parent should be forced to allow their children to be used in a
failed experiment that will impact profoundly on their children’s future.
Until and when the public education system cleans their house,
Hispanic/Latino Americans and migrant parents overwhelmingly support school
choice voucher programs.
Nonetheless, acceptable formulas which would make refunding for school
vouchers contingent upon the failing school districts ability to redeem
themselves should be explored and if possible implemented. We recommend that
the present formula be further improved by establishing criteria for
proportional spending allocations and refunds to schools that improve their
educational performances.
_____________________________________________________
Manuel Hernandez, a
contributing columnist to HispanicVista.com (www.hispanicvista.com),
lives in Puerto Rico where he teaches school. He has a B.A. and MA Teaching
English. He is a candidate for a PhD. He has just published a textbook
titled, Latino/a Literature in The English Classroom (Editorial Plaza Mayor,
2003). For more information, e-mail him at
mannyh32@puertoricans.com .
|