-
By
Patrick Osio, Jr./HispanicVista.com
- February 8, 2007
-
-
-
-
Center for Immigration Studies exposes
itself in public
- By Patrick Osio, Jr.
-
- Mark Krikorian, Executive Director of Center for Immigration
Studies (CIS), at what was dubbed a “think tank” meeting on January 26th
to review immigration issues hosted by San Diego University’s
Trans-Border Institute (TBI), called on the Department of Homeland
Security to use eminent domain to purchase from half-mile to a mile of
land along the US-Mexico border, and demolish the buildings to create
a “border security zone” to “insulate ourselves” from Mexico.
-
- Krikorian’s bizarre ideas would demolish San Ysidro, and Otay
Mesa, in San Diego. Do away with much of Calexico in Imperial Valley,
California; Nogales, Arizona, El Paso, Laredo, and Brownsville in
Texas.
-
- Krikorian was not finished. Referring to the trans-border economy
as “a parasitic phenomenon,” he rejects that cities across the border
from each other form integrated economies. Thus, he suggests that all
border crossing cards allowing visits of up to 72 hours within a 25
mile zone from the border issued to Mexican border residents who go
through a screening process, as has been done for decades, be
canceled. In short, no Mexican should be able to cross legally into
the US.
-
- Krikorian’s ‘parasitic’ border crossers contribute to the San
Diego economy over $3-billion in annual retail sales and accompanying
sales-taxes of over $235-million, not counting business to business
sales estimated at over $9-billion annually. Similarly border cities
across Arizona and Texas have integrated economies in varying degrees.
El Paso and Ciudad Juarez have for decades set the benchmark for
border cities cooperation and integration. Laredo, Texas handles over
$20-billion in annual exports to Mexico.
-
- The best thing that can be said about the fanatical ideas
presented by Krikorian is that it put an end to the deceitful
masquerade perpetrated by the Center for Immigration Studies.
-
- According to the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), CIS was
founded in 1985 “as a think tank to support the more activist work of
the anti-immigrant Federation for American Immigration Reform
(FAIR).” CIS describes itself as “independent” and “nonpartisan,” but
its studies, reports, and media releases consistently support its
restrictionist agenda…”
-
- CIS is one of several anti-immigration groups exposed in a Wall
Street Journal (“Borderline Republicans” June 14, 2004) article, “In
fact, CIS, FAIR, NumbersUSA, Project-USA and more than a half-dozen
similar groups that Republicans have become disturbingly comfy with,
were founded or funded (or both) by John Tanton, a retired doctor in
Michigan. In addition to trying to stop immigration to the U.S.,
appropriate population-control measures for Dr. Tanton and his network
include promoting China's one-child policy, sterilizing Third World
women and wider use of RU-486.”
-
- The mastermind of the groups, John Tanton, was uncovered by the
Intelligence Report published by the SPCL, “The Puppeteer,” written by
Rick Swartz on June 12, 2002. In an interview with SPLC, Swartz made
the following observation: “The (Tanton) blueprint envisaged creating
a whole array of organizations that serve the overall ideological and
political battle plan to halt immigration. …They camouflage the links
between these organizations, their true origins, so that they appear
to have arisen spontaneously. But in fact they have the same creator,
Tanton.”
-
- Swartz made another observation, “Another tactic of Tanton’s is to
turn ethnic groups on each other, to create conflict between different
ethnic and racial groups. One of his big arguments has always been
that immigration hurts blacks. FAIR has bought radio advertising on
black radio stations to push that vision… basically saying, “You know
why you don’t have a job? Because some undocumented Mexican came in
and stole yours from you.”” Swartz added, “…it’s the oldest
trick in the book. It’s called making those who don’t have a lot but
are making progress feel threatened by those coming after them.” And,
“The Tanton vision… is of an apartheid United States beset by racial
violence, and whites not going quietly into the night as their numbers
are overwhelmed by the demographics of immigration.”
-
- There is no question that academic institutions have the right,
indeed the obligation, to hold conferences on the critical issue. But
they also has the responsibility to inform its audiences beforehand
not as David Shirk, Trans-Border Institute director, commented
afterwards, “Serious scholars have to take the Mr. Krikorians of the
world seriously; they represent a long tradition of nativism in this
country.”
-
- Beyond identifying Mr. Krikorian as a nativist, his organization’s
background and nexus to other extremists groups must also be made
public at such forums. And, spouting such ridiculous ideas, how can
serious scholars and people of good will take Krikorian’s ideas
seriously?
-
______________________________________________________________________
- Patrick Osio, Jr. is the Editor of HispanicVista (www.hispanicvista.com)
and columnist with the San Diego Metropolitan Magazine (www.sandiegometro.com).
-
- (The opinions expressed by Patrick Osio, Jr. are
solely his and do not necessarily reflect those of HispanicVista.com,
editorial board of advisors or it’s contributing writers.)
|