Harvard
professor Samuel P. Huntington suggested that the
United
States
ignores the dual culture of U.S. Hispanics — the “Hispanic
Challenge” — at its own peril.
A clash of generations
He is
absolutely right – but not for the reasons he promotes.
|

|
|
Investing in better educating Hispanic youths in America
should be considered — not as a favor to
Hispanic-Americans — but as an investment in the U.S.
economy and the national retirement plan. |
|

|
|
Rather,
the real challenge for U.S. society is how to give young
Hispanics the skills they will need to support the country’s
aging non-Hispanic white population.
The peril
faced by the White Anglo-Saxon Protestant (WASP) part of the
population described by Huntington is that they are aging very
fast — and that their social security benefits will depend on
the earning power of young U.S. Hispanics to a degree that few
Americans today realize.
A shrinking support-base
To
illustrate why, consider that in 1950, there were 16 workers for
each person receiving social security retirement benefits. That
figure had dropped to 3.3 workers per beneficiary by 1994.
And the
ratio between workers and recipients will only drop further. By
2025, there will be down to two workers — and by 2050 to 1.3
workers per recipient.
What are the numbers?
This is
where the Hispanic population comes in, which overall is much
younger than the non-Hispanic white population.
|

|
|
Among
Hispanics, 48% are under 25 years old — and only 19% are
45 or older. |
|

|
|
Among
Hispanics, 48% are under 25 years old and only 19% are 45 or
older. There are 2.6 young Hispanics for every mature Hispanic
worker or retiree.
Among
non-Hispanic whites, the numbers are very different: 32% are
under 25, while 38% are 45 or older. That adds up to less than
one young person for every mature worker or retiree.
The hitch
This
obviously means that Hispanics will play a disproportionately
large future role in financing social security benefits for
elderly Americans.
The
problem is that Hispanics make less money on average — and thus
pay fewer contributions into the system than many of the
non-Hispanic white Americans who will be retiring soon.
What it all adds up to
Presently, the three-year annual average earning of non-Hispanic
whites is $47,194 —while the average for Hispanics is $33,946.
|

|
|
Presently, 21.8% of Hispanics possess only elementary
education. |
|

|
|
The
combination of social security taxes paid by employee and
employers amounts to 15.3% of income, up to a level of $87,900.
Because
of their higher average incomes, non-Hispanic whites on average
pay $7,220 in social security taxes each year, while Hispanics
only pay about $5,193 — a difference of $2,027.
This may
not seem like much, but it adds up to a difference of $2 billion
or more for every one million workers.
Plan ahead
When
today’s non-Hispanic white workers reach retirement age and
start collecting their social security benefits, the working-age
population will be far more heavily Hispanic than today.
The real
challenge is to prepare today’s young people so that they will
have high future earnings, generating ample tax revenue with
which to cover the social security promises to today’s workers.
This means that special attention must be given to preparing
Hispanic youth for high-paying jobs.
Avoiding the obvious
Elected
officials are far more preoccupied with ”solutions” to the
social security financing problem — like private accounts — that
fix nothing fundamentally.
|

|
|
Because
of their higher average incomes, non-Hispanic whites on
average pay $7,220 in social security taxes each year,
while Hispanics only pay about $5,193 — a difference of
$2,027. |
|

|
|
Over the
years, various stopgap measures have been introduced: Taxes have
been raised, as have taxable earnings. Benefits have been
reduced as well, by postponing the age of retirement.
In 2004,
full benefits are obtained at age 65 and four months. Each year,
this retirement age will increase by two months — until full
benefit retirement age will have reached 67.
For
today’s workers, this amounts to a benefit reduction combined
with an additional two years of contributions.
Other choices
Without
raising taxes again or increasing retirement age any further,
there are two alternatives left, both of which are important for
all Americans — but especially for Hispanics.
The first
is to invest in the education and preparation of U.S. youth to
achieve higher earnings and higher contributions.
A smart decision
The
second is to increase the number of young immigrants allowed
into the United States.
|

|
|
By
2025, there will be two workers for each person
receiving social security benefits. |
|

|
|
They can
carry part of the load by raising the number of available
workers per retiree.
Investing
in better educating and preparing Hispanic youths should be
considered not as a favor to Hispanic-Americans, but as an
investment in the national economy and the national retirement
plan.
Developing our resources
Presently, 21.8% of Hispanics possess only elementary education.
This has to undergo a dramatic change in the next 10-15 years.
And greater emphasis must be placed on education for the trades.
Not
everyone is destined for college, and there are huge numbers of
well paying jobs in the trades — but little educational emphasis
and attention is paid to this type of preparation.
The obvious answer
To
retirees, it makes little difference whether the workers paying
their retirement benefits speak Spanish, Hindi or any other
language among themselves or at home.
Retirees
could care less if the workers paying payroll taxes retain their
former homeland’s culture or enjoy media in their ancestral
language.
What
would really bother retirees would be to receive a letter from
the social security administration announcing benefit cuts.
So, yes,
let white, non-Hispanic America continue worrying about Hispanic
culture. But white America avoids investing in its future
workers and taxpayers — in Hispanic youth — at its own peril. |