While emotional outbursts against Mexico may
provide venue for venting anger and frustration, they continue to ignore
US industries' role and the reality of our present situation.
Illegal immigration exists because there are
individuals and businesses willing to break US federal laws prohibiting
hiring of undocumented workers instead of availing themselves of
existing guest-worker programs, such as the H-2A visas for temporary
agricultural workers. So if the Mexicans who cross our border illegally
are criminals, so are those Americans hiring them.
Instead of an aggressive enforcement campaign
against such hiring practices, public officials in response to special
interests have for years opted for building fences, and adding Border
Patrol officers along the border, but never enough. Fences and officers
to keep people out, also keeps people in, so it is not surprising that
the 2000 census found that of the potential 8 million illegal
immigrants, over 37 percent, 3 million, are from Mexico.
The seduction of our elected officials through
campaign donations and political support by special interests needing
plentiful cheap and non-complaining labor has had its consequences
bringing us to the present situation. According to the Urban Institute
undocumented immigrants represent 34 percent of domestic workers; 23
percent of agricultural and fisheries workers; 21 percent of textile and
assembly workers; 18 percent of service workers; 18 percent of material
handlers and helpers; and 12 percent of transportation workers. Though
it may be hard to swallow, there are sectors throughout the US that
would collapse without these immigrants.
Not granting amnesty does not mean the millions
denied it would return to Mexico. Now what? Finding and deporting such
vast numbers would require far more personnel and economic resources
than some form of official pardon. And those deported, because of their
economic desperation, would make multiple attempts at returning.
The absence of a guest-worker program would not
stop illegal border crossings, so the US would have to provide more than
ten times the present available border resources to make a dent on the
problem at a cost far higher than a guest-worker program, and still not
succeed, nor satisfy the needs for their type of labor in the US.
Indications are that amnesty will face unpopular
public and political support in the US. Instead the US should
consider a guest-work program that would include those who are already
here. The program could allow for renewal periods, and include as
"guests" their immediate family members. Newcomers would enter as
"contracted-guest-workers" with specific jobs waiting.
However, any program can only work provided
aggressive enforcement, and severe fines and sentences are included in
existing laws prohibiting the hiring of undocumented workers.
This may include the need for a forgery-proof
national ID card.
The argument that such a card would be an intrusion
on our privacy and lend itself to abuse is lame, as we gave up privacy
and opened the door to abuse when we applied for a Social Security
number, a driver's license, a passport, or the first credit card.
In some US industries it is far cheaper to hire
undocumented workers, and then plead not knowing their status. These
industries are heavy political contributors and wield much power. So we
are faced with the ultimate question - will the people's Congressional
representatives and Senators forgo special interests or will this turn
into another round of Mexico bashing as the excuse for doing little?