-
By
Patrick Osio, Jr./HispanicVista.com
- July 1, 2007
-
-
-
-
- OK, I give up. I am now joining Lou Dobbs cadre of followers
yelling for border enforcement, no amnesty for illegal immigrants,
round them up and build the fence that will keep them out and enforce
the laws prohibiting hiring undocumented workers.
-
- The problem that I have is that the objectives as above described
are well defined, but not the how to. Yes there is a law calling for
the building of 700 miles of fence, and to add another 6,000 Border
Patrol agents to man the border. And yes, there is a call for
enforcing employer hiring practices – but all these fall short of
explaining to us how to accomplish this and how these actions will
guarantee success. Just saying it doesn’t make it happen.
-
- For starters, the failed immigration reform laws that have been
defeated in the Senate had nothing to do with National Security as in
“stop terrorists at the border.” By killing the idea that those in the
US illegally will not be permitted to come forward, admit their
illegal status (guilt) and pay a fine, and by not creating stricter
laws prohibiting hiring of undocumented workers, what has been
accomplished to secure the nation?
-
- Additionally, since around 5-million of the 12-million illegal
immigrants in the country entered through airports, seaports and
Canada, how will these entries be stopped, how do we identify
these unwanted intruders, and what are are we going to do with them?
-
- Now, getting back to the Lou Dobbs manifesto for stopping
intrusions from the Southern border: Build the 700-mile fence and add
the additional 6,000 Border Patrol agents.
-
- Seven-hundred miles on a 2000 mile border, seems far short of what
it should be to be completely effective. Why not bite the bullet and
go the whole way? According to Dobbs the singular most important
national issue that has to be addressed if we are to survive as a
nation. I’m with him, but let’s do it right.
-
- But, what we have as of now is a law calling for the building of
the 700 mile fence. We do have to pay attention to another guru on
this issue, presidential candidate and US Congressman Duncan Hunter.
He is the only one in Congress with actual border fence building
experience.
-
- Back in the ‘90s, Hunter had a fence built from the Pacific Ocean
traveling east for 14 miles. Soon after the fence was erected he noted
that it didn’t really do the complete job, so he had another 14 miles
parallel to the first fence built. The 2-fences stopped around 80
percent of crossings over the fence. He now concludes that a 3rd
parallel fence is needed to stop the remaining 20 percent climbing
over the fences.
-
- Hunter has experience so we must listen. Thus the 700 miles we
know will not work unless 3 parallel fences are built. There are
savings to be had if the 3 fences are built at the same time, so the
cost for the 2100 miles of fences can be kept down to somewhere
between 15 to 20 billion dollars.
-
- We all know that the 700 3-parallel fences won’t stop illegal
crossings, but the idea is to channel crossers into the waiting arms
of the Border Patrol. Genius, sheer genius.
-
- However, this brings out another slight problem – 6,000 new Border
Patrol agents? This number is not nearly enough. The 6,000 added to
the existing ranks will bring the force to around 18,000. Sounds like
a good number, but the force also has to protect the Canadian border.
Even assuming the 18,000 would be on the southern border that is only
9 agents per mile, and considering that there has to be 3 shifts,
that’s only 3 agents per mile with no days off.
-
- Lets be honest, the need is at least a force of 100,000 that would
provide around slightly better than then 10 agents per mile per shift
with 2 days a week off. Of course, this is only for the southern
border, not for airports, seaports or Canadian border. And, there is a
need for administrative support that at a 5 to 1 would add another
5,000 to the force. Payroll and benefits for the force would start at
around $15-billion per year, and increase by several percentage points
per annum with cost of living raises, retirement contributions, health
care insurance, and inflation for equipment and supplies.
-
- There is also the question of equipment, vehicles, guns, night
vision, communication and computer equipment, trailers, etc., etc. so
add another 10-billion dollars for the capital investment and around
1-billion dollars per year for upkeep and replacements.
-
- My new guru, Mr. Dobbs makes it clear that border security without
enforcing illegal hiring practices of employers will not work. He is
soooo right.
-
- The estimate is that in 2007, over 31-million businesses in the US
will file income tax returns, so the task of enforcing hiring
practices is not an easy one, but one that has to be done in order to
succeed in stopping illegal immigration. So we need to increase the
ICE number of agents dedicated to policing and enforcing the law
prohibiting hiring undocumented workers in effect since 1986.
-
- To make a tough job easier, we should start with the agricultural
sector where it is known that the majority of field workers are
undocumented. Raid the fields, audit the books, and make it mandatory
to submit Social Security numbers for checking their issuance.
-
- Mr. Dobbs makes no bones about it. He dispels the idea that there
are not enough Americans to do the jobs illegal immigrants do. If he
is right, we got a winner.
-
- If he’s wrong, not much is lost. Farmers will either pay a lot
more to attract American workers, or move their operations out of
country. We use far more oil than we produce, and are use to it, so
big deal we will depend on foreign trade for our food.
-
- But the good news is that Lou Dobbs is always right, just ask him.
- ________________________________________________________
- Patrick Osio, Jr is the editor of HispanicVista.com (http://www.hispanicvista.com).
Contact at:
PosioJr@hispanicvista.com
- (The opinions expressed by Patrick Osio, Jr. are
solely his and do not necessarily reflect those of HispanicVista.com,
editorial board of advisors or it’s contributing writers.)
|