Is it about illegal immigration or
keeping non-white people out?
By
Patrick Osio, Jr./HispanicVista.com
October 7, 2005
Are there still some Americans who believe
that the immigration issues as pertain to our Southern border are
primarily about National Security? Or that statements calling for
defending “national sovereignty” are due to fears we are losing our
nation’s independence? Fortunately, evidence indicates that those of
such mind are a small minority, but are capable of attracting the most
media attention.
Unfortunately the attention the ‘national-security’ and
‘sovereignty’ advocates receive, clouds the issues, delays solutions
and prolongs the agony. They hang their hat on the one fact the vast
majority of Americans do agree – illegal immigration must stop.
Using this as their basis for their other contentions they darken
the landscape with myths they wish to believe; present them as fact
and where evidence does not support their “facts” they simply invent
supporting data, which others in their groups use as evidence. So they
feed unto themselves with nothing more than figments of their
imagination based on personal prejudices and individual or
organization self interests.
There are hidden agendas for the attacks that as the main basis
have to do with the high number of brown skinned people of a different
culture and language entering and living among us be they multi
generation US citizens or legal residents – the paranoia that America
is turning brown. And this, my friends, is racism despite denial to
the contrary.
Mexicans and Latin Americans entering the US illegally provide the
perfect cover for racist to practice their sin under the guise of
“patriotism” and quest for “justice” and “adherence to law.” Illegal
immigration has freed them from the otherwise political correctness
and civil rights laws that would otherwise restrain their activities.
How else to justify American civilians prancing along the
US-Mexico border armed with bats, machetes, rifles, shotguns and side
arms under the guise of “protecting our border” armed only for “self
defense”? In other words, if a would be gardener refuses to stop, they
are open game or as one such racist asked in one of their amongst
themselves training session – “Can we shoot them?”
And what does stopping illegal immigration today have to do with
calling for the repeal of the Immigration and Naturalization Act of
1965? Nothing, but it has a lot to do with stopping national diversity
by stopping any further legal immigration from third world countries.
Georgie Anne Geyer, a darling columnist apostle for the whitening
of America, wrote a very telling article on this subject (Immigration:
The elephant in America’s room. – 10/04/05). From her article: "Before
1965, 95 percent of the new immigrants had come from Europe. After
1965, 95 percent came from the Third World,” she quoted from a speech
by Steven Gillon, at the annual meeting of the anti-immigration
Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), which she also
attended.
Geyer then explained in her own words, “What the bill did was to
take quotas away from mostly Europeans (until then, immigrants were
taken according to their percentage of the American people) and open
immigration to Asia and the rest of the Third World.”
Geyer adds, “Dan Stein, the talented president of FAIR, turned to
me and asked: "How, in the wake of the London bombings by children of
immigrants, can there be no discussion of immigration in this
country?... The bombings were a signal being sent to all of us that
something is profoundly wrong in denigrating our heritage to the point
where the children of immigrants are being raised to hate us."
The above is an obvious attempt at creating suspicion and fear of
non-white immigrants and their children, while conveniently repressing
that in the US the only “children of immigrants” guilty of terrorism
are Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols, Oklahoma bombers, and Eric
Rudolph, abortion clinic and Atlanta Olympics’ bomber, all white
middle America members.
This should not be surprising as FAIR’s Stein has warned “that
certain immigrant groups are engaged in ‘competitive breeding’ aimed
at diminishing white power. Or how about the comment from another of
FAIR’s board members, Garrett Hardin, that aiding starving Africans is
counterproductive and will only “encourage population growth.”
It should be clearer that for some of the nation’s loudest voices,
illegal immigration is not the issue - it is simply about keeping out
and internally diminishing non-white people.
(The opinions expressed by Patrick Osio, Jr. are
solely his and do not necessarily reflect those of HispanicVista.com,
editorial board of advisors or it’s contributing writers.)
Patrick
Osio, Jr. has written a short but intensive manual on the Mexican
perspective on numerous issues between our two countries. The manual is an
in depth primer on the culture and protocol for better understanding
Mexicans that in turn allows establishing personal and business
relationships, and how to avoid the most common faux pas that can ruin
relationships and business deals.
The manual is available through Electronic delivery for $9.95
making it possible to download the manual to save on your hard
drive, printing its entirety or particular sections while
reaping considerable savings over printed copies.