The city of Escondido’s Ordinance No. 2006-38 has
become the cause cèlébre for both the hard line anti and pro illegal
immigrant rights groups. The ordinance calls for criminalizing renting
living quarters to illegal immigrants under the premise that federal
law prohibits the harboring of illegal aliens. And, since “state and
federal authorities lack the resources to protect the citizens of the
city of Escondido” the law is a must to fulfill the city’s obligation
to its citizens, so say proponents.
Opponents say this is nothing short of city
racial and economic cleansing.
Opponents of the ordinance are right.
Be it by intention or the unintended consequences
of a bad law – in the end it is nothing more than an attempt at racial
cleansing of a city and getting poor families out.
The claim that the city needs to enact such a law
because the federal government cannot protect the city’s citizens is
pure rubbish and a ridiculous attempt at justifying such bigoted
legislation.
The Census estimate is that there are about 12
million illegal immigrants in the US, around 6.5 million from Mexico,
leaving around 5.5 million from countries other than Mexico. The
Escondido ordinance targets only those from Mexico and the aim is to
concentrate only in the poorest neighborhoods where Latino families
are concentrated.
This by any definition is discriminatory
legislation and thus bigoted.
It is no accident that since the enactment of the
law, only landlords in the heavily populated Latino side of town are
the ones calling city officials to obtain information on how to
proceed. No one from the non-Hispanic sections of town is worried.
Why? Simply because they know they will not be challenged to present
proof of citizenship or residency legal status – as long as they are
“white.”
During the 1980s and much of the 1990s, Escondido
was hell bent on growth, approving housing tracts and commercial
centers with a fury that made it one of the fastest growing cities in
San Diego County. In such days, low cost labor was welcomed. The city
never objected, those workers needed to live somewhere, but they were
not welcomed anywhere so they settled in the “rundown” section of the
city where other Latinos who worked in the city’s fruit groves had
long ago settled.
The city is now nearly all built up so the need
for much of that labor is not vital, and those neighborhoods could be
upgraded if only such poor people didn’t live there.
The ordinance makes reference to federal law
forbidding the “harboring” of illegal aliens attempting to justify
city law. However, federal law also prohibits “hiring” illegal aliens,
but there is no mention of making it illegal to hire or to have
workers who are not able to provide proof of citizenship or legal
residency status in the city.
Presumably then, it’s OK to work but not live in
Escondido under such a law. So why would the city choose to force
landlords to verify immigration status of tenants, but not business to
do the same?
The ordinance provides that landlords failing to
comply would lose their city business license. Well, businesses must
also have city business licenses, the verification process would be
the same with the same penalty.
The reason is the obvious. Many businesses need
cheap labor without which they would not survive. Typically, however,
such businesses using cheap labor have those who earn more, some much
more, who are not illegal immigrants, but it’s the cheap labor of the
illegal immigrant that makes it possible for the higher wages to be
paid. Those businesses closing, through compliance or as a penalty for
non compliance, would cause unemployment for many who are part of the
mainstream work force.
So the bigotry of Escondido city will play out in
the national stage wherein eventually a court, at a great cost to
Escondido tax payers, will remind small town legislators that
discriminatory practice by any name or under whatever excuse is
forbidden by the US Constitution.