Home Letters to Editor / Announcements / Columnists / Archive / Subscribe / About Us / Contact Us

HispanicVista Columnists

Toolmaker For The World
By Richard N. Baldwin T. /HispanicVista.com
   February 15, 2008
  From Mexico
   

 

Toolmaker For The World
 By Richard N. Baldwin T. /HispanicVista.com
 
     The title here is taken from the poem "Chicago" by Carl Sandburg in 1916. "Hog Butcher for the World, Toolmaker, Stacker of Wheat, Player with Railroads and the Nation's Freight Handler."  In the almost century that this poem was written, a lot has changed.

     The Hog Butcher part has long ended as most meat processing is done closer to the source of production.

     As far as the Toolmaker, I spent 35 years of a prior life in Chicago in that business. The Chicago area had over 600 toolmaking firms locally then. The normal Sunday classified advertisements for Moldmakers (a specialty of toolmaking) averaged at least 12 ads, sometimes as many as 20. Now, a countrywide search for moldmaker ads will net about 6. If you are looking for molds (for plastic or diecasting), you go to China. More on this below.

     As for Wheat (and grains), this is still a vital economic area for Chicago.

     And Chicago remains a major transportation hub for the US in rail, sea and air.

     A lot of the former economy of Chicago has been taken up in the financial area, but as a manufacturing center, Chicago, once host to thousands of smaller manufacturing firms, is no longer a "smokestack city".

     I am reminded of Pat Buchanan's "Hollowing out of America" phrase. Although I don't agree with many of his conclusions, his facts are good.

     Toolmaking is a vital foundation for a manufacturing economy. Without tools, you make nothing. By making, I mean actually making what is sold, not just assembling components. And as such, toolmaking was one of the most important leading indicators for economic trends.

     Let's step back a little. Remember Germany a few years ago as being written off as a dying economy? A country that due to various internal policies became overpriced and moribund as an exporter. Surprise! Germany (since 2003) is now the leading export country in the world. The US with China creeping upward follows this. Japan runs a distant third. The one thing that Germany never abandoned was placing the highest emphasis on quality along with innovation. The German manufacturers overcame their problems by using temporary labor, setting up "offshore" plants and concentrating on higher technology for developing products with very high R&D spending. (The largest Volkswagen plant is now in México along with a large Bosch plant for auto components.)  For the record, Bosch runs a large in-plant school division to train their incoming employees how to function in a modern plant. I would imagine that Volkswagen does the same. And Bosch prefers prospective employees right off the farm, not products of México's educational system.

     But lately, Germany has been pulling more and more of these "offshore" plants back into Germany. Germany's machinery exports has been growing at 15% a year, the auto sector by 11%. Germany's share of the world export market is at 9.4%. The US stands at 8.6% with China at 8.1%. Almost inverse to their respective populations. And Germany is doing this with a very highly priced currency (the Euro). The US is hanging on by exploiting their lower valued Dollar.

     The bottom line is that Germany has gone back to a vital fundamental economic basic: manufacturing makes the foundation to a country's economic well being. It creates the jobs that build a vital internal market.

     As far as internal markets go, it is the stated policy of China to develop, as fast as practical, a strong internal market. And this is while the internal market in the US, the world's largest, is falling behind.

     There are lessons here for both the US and Mexico here. Exporting products forms the basis for a prosperous economy and provides the jobs for an internal market.  Lessons that México has not learned and that the US seems to have forgotten.

     In addition, consider this: In a foreign owned plant or company (foreign direct investment or FDI), the profits go to the investor. In an internally owned plant, the profits stay in the host country. México should consider using more of their internal capital to build Mexican owned plants and companies. Yes, the money is there if a more favorable government environment were present. But in the US, offshore countries increasingly own more and more businesses. This has something to do with the fact that the US is now operating as a debtor country with its out of control national budget and negative trade balances.

     From the US view, a Mexican location for a plant to import product from is more favorable to national finance that one in Asia. At least the trade balance is much better in México's case.

     For México, it is of note that México is increasing manufacturing at a fairly good pace. What are needed are more educational innovations to upgrade their worker base to higher levels of work in Mexico.

     Both countries should remember is that to really make money, making and exporting goods is best. Playing with other people's money (the financial sector) is not broad enough. And simply importing goods from overseas and marketing them internally is the poorest way for a country to make money.
_____________________________________
Richard N. Baldwin T., a HispanicVista.com (www.hispanicvista.com) contributing columnist, lives in Tlalnepantla, Edo de México. E-mail at: R1041643422@aol.com