|
|
|
|
|
HispanicVista Columnists |
|
Policy And Katrina |
-
By
Richard N. Baldwin T. /HispanicVista.com
-
September 28, 2005
-
-
-
- The blame game over the US government
response (or I should say governments) is in high gear. Day by day
there are more sad details coming out that reveal faulty or delayed
actions at federal, state and local levels. Of course, calls are
made to investigate what and who went wrong. Outside of trying to do
the best and most rapid actions now and get into investigations
after the dust settles, it appears to me that any of the processes
of investigation called for are flawed. All investigations suggested
so far would have vested interests and try and cover up. I like Bill
O'Reilly's suggestion of an independent board made up of retired
military general officers. They would have nothing to hide and would
be immune to pressures. That said, I would like to address what led
to this "unacceptable" performance across the board (President
Bush's word). And for this, we have to go back a number of years.
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) was created and
raised to a cabinet level independent agency with a lot of power to
be able to direct recovery efforts for national disasters. They had
the power necessary to channel money and people to do the job as
fast as possible. As such, it was known world wide as one of the
finest organizations of its type. It was not that well known because
it was in the background until disaster struck. But there have been
some conservatives who thought that FEMA, as a government agency,
had too much power. This has been under the political surface for
many years, and with the advent of the present Bush administration,
the downgrading of FEMA started.
The first thing that happened was cutting back projects funding
(like a program for preparing for the next big earthquake in the
Seattle area). The agency was cut back and the exodus of seasoned
specialists from that agency started. And funding is still low.
In 2001, after the 9/11 attack, a new federal department,
Department of Homeland Security (DHS), was created as part of the
reaction to bad and confused intelligence that caught the US
completely unaware of the growing threat. As I said before, adding
layers of bureaucracy never solves anything except making things
more cumbersome. In addition, FEMA was reduced from its former
cabinet level position to become a part of the DHS bureaucracy. Some
FEMA people say that they have to get permission to go to the
bathroom from DHS now. In other words, what was once a lean, mean
fast response operation is now part of a burgeoned and bloated
far-flung operation that has its main focus on terrorism. Sorry
about this, but natural disasters don't come on the scene high
jacking airliners with box cutters. After the structural change,
Michael Brown, a bureaucrat with no FEMA or related background was
placed in charge of the stripped down operation. Another paper
shuffler. Now, the DHS has had its first real test, and it failed .
. . badly. And this time they had days of warnings.
Brown is out now. Good. He will probably be given a medal and
his "resignation" will be accepted with "reluctance". I remember one
case of a president getting rid of a non-performing key functionary.
When asked if he (it was Harry Truman) had accepted the man's
resignation, Truman said "I didn't accept his resignation, I fired
him". I miss HST, he told things like they were.
If this wasn't bad enough, several states have mimicked the
federal government and set up their own DHS operations. Louisiana is
one of them. They were the ones who held up the Red Cross for 2 or 3
days waiting for permission to deliver needed aid while the
Louisiana DHS shuffled papers. They also blocked AMTRAK to aid in
evacuation efforts.
Now let's look at the National Guard. For the first time since
the Revolutionary War, the US is now fighting a real war without
conscription. And to make up for needed manpower; the National Guard
(along with the active reserve forces) is being used in a big way.
The fact that the war was not properly planned or prepared for is
not our subject, but the result is that the National Guard system
has been decimated by the Iraq war. And if that is not enough, the
Pentagon wants to close many Guard bases and "consolidate"
operations to save money.
In Louisiana, a lot of their guard members are in Iraq. It is
the prime responsibility of the National Guard to be available to
combat local disasters. This may have been some of the thinking of
the governor of Louisiana when asked by President Bush to release
the remaining Louisiana Guard to federal control. She refused after
first asking for help.
The president of the United States has the power to federalize
any state National Guard forces when needed with a stroke of his
pen. There is ample legal precedence, but Bush did not act.
After President Bush, the one federal official that has the
power to mobilize vast federal response was DHS head Michael
Chertoff who can act with or without requests from state and local
officials. He also has the responsibility to issue the critical
"Incident of National Significance" statement that starts the ball
rolling, but didn't act until 36 hours after Katrina struck.
Chertoff has never explained that yet. And Brown reported to
Chertoff.
Possibly Bush's problem is that he thought the DHS bureaucracy
that he and congress created would actually work in an emergency.
Think about that.
Not to put everything on the federal government's plate, we had
a waffling governor and a mayor (of New Orleans) who were acting
like they lived on different planets. And no one at state or local
level seems to have taken the results of the dress rehearsal called
"Hurricane Pam" a year ago. This clearly showed many flaws in the
standing disaster response plan including no plan to evacuate the
large poverty level population in New Orleans.
In short, the US governments have been practicing what I call
here "the Mexican Two Step". Rather than trying to solve problems,
just create more bureaucracy. It's harder to fix blame that way.
I commend the Mexican government who asked for permission to
send a contingent of the Mexican military to help. Three days after
Bush agreed, the Mexican army crossed the Texas border and a Mexican
naval vessel was on the way to New Orleans. Good Show!
____________________________________
Richard N. Baldwin T., a HispanicVista.com (http://www.hispanicvista.com/)
contributing columnist, lives in Tlalnepantla, Edo de México. E-mail
at:
R1041643422@aol.com