Home Letters to Editor / Announcements / Columnists / Archive / Subscribe / About Us / Contact Us

HispanicVista Columnists

The People Dressed In Black

By Richard N. Baldwin T. /HispanicVista.com
   December 7, 2005

    From Mexico
 
     This is not about the movie Men in Black. The title comes from an old spiritual song called "Go tell in on the mountain". In the song is the phrase, "Who's that yonder dressed in black? Must be the hypocrites turnin' back". Well, we do have hypocrites in our part of the world. And they are turning back on issues concerning immigration - in both México and the United States.

     First let’s agree: Every country has the right, if not the obligation to control its borders. And this includes the right to regulate who and what enters and exits across those borders. It is also the obligation of a sovereign country to protect its citizens from threats from abroad. These are the reasons that countries have immigration controls and customs along with necessary enforcement personnel to assure that borders are orderly and function in their country’s best interests. There is no inherent right of foreigners to cross borders. Border crossings is the exclusive domain of each country acting in their best interests. It also helps, but is not required, that these processes be fair to all. But, let's look at what is going on either side of the US-Mexico border.

     México: For years, México has had a policy of using the northern border as a social "safety valve". This policy recognizes that México, even after establishing the "in bond" assembly plants in the North, is not capable of creating enough jobs for its population. And more recent changes in the social/financial landscape have exacerbated the situation. Still trying to market "cheap labor" in this day and age considering the lock that Asia has on that sector is out of reality. But rather than trying to fix the structural problems, México finds it easier to just export the problem to the North. The "safety valve" concept is, as Tony Garza, US ambassador to México, said, "not a sustainable policy". In addition, the increase of "remittances" sent home from the North by México's ex-pats is keeping México financially afloat (due to a nonfunctional national tax system). So, as a result, México unofficially does everything possible to encourage this northward migration. And while complaining about mistreatment of their migrants (read illegals) in the US the Mexican government rightly requires full documentation of incoming migrants to México for any legal rights. This is hypocrisy. But, we must also point out that México does have a functioning immigration system that allows for an orderly immigration process.

     The United States: The US does have a real need for incoming migrants for a number of reasons, but won't admit it. Many of the same forces that confound México are also threatening the US. Namely globalization. In order to compete in the worldwide market, they must improve productivity. Read this as doing more with fewer employees and lower paid employees at that. This is only an extension of what has been going on in Europe, although not as extreme . . . yet. Businesses are reorganizing, going offshore and declaring bankruptcy in a mad scramble to compete in the word market. And this also includes sharp cuts in traditional benefits. Take a look at the airline and automakers if you don't believe me. And with migrants willing to work for far less than the natives (and still able to send money back home), many businesses have found a way to keep operating onshore by using illegals. This is hypocrisy. One of the big complaints is how much of a load that the illegals put on social services like medical aid. But they ignore the fact that the illegal sector is only part of the increase. You have to add in the number of natives that have lost benefits due to the general cutbacks in benefits.

     Whether either side will come clean on this situation is problematical. The government in México is in a state of paralysis. The blame game is in full swing while the political campaign for the 2006 election has started. And it would seem the same in the US with posturing and campaigning for the 2006 mid-elections and believe it or not, for the 2008 election.

     The out-of-control common border situation is ripe for real problems. That includes the immense dope traffic (that the US won't control the market for) along with the world wide terror threat. In addition, any serious disruption of the northward flow of migrants seeking jobs will certainly destabilize México quickly.

     One thing about "border control" that is overlooked in the US by many, is that along with "securing" the border, is the need for the improvement of the ossified immigration system that had been in continual deterioration for many administrations in the US. An orderly system would allow "vetted" migrants to do needed work, and would allow the return to their homeland to those who have completed the work . . . and be available for future jobs later. Many retired border patrol personnel state that updating the control process could solve 90% of the border problem. I maintain that a visa system that requires 6 months to issue even a tourist visa is broken. Unfortunately past and present US administrations have been loath to fix this. And few recent proposals really address that situation.

     For México, they are at a crossroad. Whether to clean up their act and fully join the "first world" or stick their heads in the sand and hope for the best. That hasn't worked in the past and won't work for the future.

     In spite of all the above, it is encouraging to see increasing cooperation between México and the US on cross border issues. I note the recognition in San Diego of Mexican police cooperation of tracking down and returning to the US of fleeing criminals. And Mexico is trying hard to cut down the dope trade going to the US dope market. That war has cost a lot of lives in Mexico. And we note the cross border cooperation on fire fighting in the San Diego area. We can work together for our mutual benefit, you know.

     But there are a lot of people dressed in black on both sides of the border.
 _____________________________________
Richard N. Baldwin T., a HispanicVista.com (http://www.hispanicvista.com/) contributing columnist, lives in Tlalnepantla, Edo de México. E-mail at: R1041643422@aol.com