Awareness of the huge American
Hispanic population brings attention. Such attention is
directed at that population and how it participates in the
American nation.
This is good
news. It has been 50-years since the Mexican American
population was recognized in a landmark civil rights
Supreme Court case, Hernandez v. Texas. The decision
defined the community as a discrete group that was
systematically denied equal rights and treatment, despite
decades of military and glorious wartime service in the
United States military.
Critics of
the population constantly berate it for not
"assimilating." On the other hand, critics from within the
community claim the majority is taking advantage of the
community with deceit and outright lying. Most Hispanics
reject the notion of being snookered by the majority.
The argument
is crystallizing in a new effort by the United States Army
to recruit more Mexican American and other Hispanic young
people into the military. The Army is increasing its
recruiting budget and personnel specifically to recruit
Hispanics, That effort is creating a conflict, a conflict
led by the usual suspect left-wing radicals that populate
the extremist edge of the Hispanic community.
The New York
Times: "From 2001 to 2005, the number of Latino
enlistments in the Army rose 26 percent, and in the
military as a whole, the increase was 18 percent. The
increase comes at a time when the Army is struggling to
recruit new soldiers and when the enlistment of
African-Americans, a group particularly disillusioned with
the war in Iraq, has dropped off sharply, to 14.5 percent
from 22.3 percent over the past four years."
"We see a
lot of confusion among immigrant parents, and recruiters
are preying on that confusion," Jorge Mariscal, a radical
leftist Vietnam veteran told the New York Times. He is
director of the Chicano/Latino Arts and Humanities Program
at the University of California, San Diego. Fact:
Immigrant enlistments have actually fallen a bit. So, who
is being confused?
The New York
Times: "Hispanics have long been underrepresented in the
Army and in the military as a whole. While Latinos make up
10.8 percent of the Army's active-duty force, a better
rate than the Air Force or Navy, they account for 14
percent of the population as a whole." Fact: Hispanic
United States Marines are far more numerous than in other
services and of their percentage of the population.
Laughingly,
the Times and Mariscal ignore the huge enlistment numbers
of Mexican Americans in the United States Marines. There
are estimates that up to 33% of all Marines that fought in
Afghanistan’s liberation from the Taliban were Mexican
American. Those estimates are ignored by Mariscal and
other critics. In Iraq, the percentage of Mexican American
casualties is high because their percentages on the ground
--in combat units -- is high.
Mariscal
equates his Vietnam experience as an Army draftee with
today’s 100 percent volunteer service. That is a
misrepresentation of actual facts and history. Are we
comparing apples and oranges; and, is that fair?
The New York
Times: "…they (Hispanics) are more likely to complete boot
camp and finish their military service, according to a
2004 study on Marine recruitment by CNA, a research group
that operates the Center for Naval Analyses and the
Institute for Public Research. Recruitment
studies show that Hispanics' re-enlistment rates are also
the highest among any group of soldiers."
(emphasis added)
Keeping this
in mind, one needs to look to Canada to see American Army
deserters Jeremy Hinzman and Brandon Hughey have applied
for asylum to avoid being sent back to the United States
to be prosecuted for desertion. There are an estimated 200
such cases of Americans deserting and fleeing to Canada.
Are any Hispanics among them? It does not appear to be so.
The usual
suspects have drawn the attention of the New York Times in
their anti-recruitment crusades, but are they effective
and do they really represent the Hispanic community? The
answer is in the New York Times itself.
Recruitment studies show that Hispanics' re-enlistment
rates are also the highest among any group of soldiers."
(emphasis added)
"The
recruiter does not lie, but he does not tell the whole
truth," says Fernando Suarez de Solar, anti-war crusader
from California that Mariscal defends despite the man’s
insult to his own son, Jesus, a gung-ho volunteer United
States Marine who died in the early hours of the Iraq war.
Mr. Suarez, with no American military experience and few
English skills despite a dozen years in the United States
told the New York Times: "If you don't know the question
to ask, you don't get the information. With language and
cultural differences, it's complicated." The Times
accepted this lame statement without any counterbalancing
view.
The very
young people involved resoundingly reject Suarez de Solar
and Mariscal. Once again: Recruitment studies
show that Hispanics' re-enlistment rates are also the
highest among any group of soldiers."
(emphasis added) They ask the right questions and answer
them themselves by re-enlisting.
Contreras’s
newest book—THE ILLEGAL ALIEN: A DAGGER INTO THE
HEART OF AMERICA published by Floricanto Press is
available and reviewed at
www.amazon.com and
www.barnesandnoble.com