Guest Column
Sometimes Imperfect Reform is Better Than Perfect Deportation
By Alfredo Gutierrez
I do a daily radio talk show on Radio Campesina in Phoenix and, clearly,
since the November elections callers are once more allowing themselves to
dream of the day their hard, hidden existence comes to an end. Their dreams
are tentative and cautious, but nonetheless hope has been resurrected. Yet
in Arizona hope is interspersed with anger. Four anti-immigrant referendums
passed overwhelmingly, one of which, Proposition 300, will impose steep
tuition increases for undocumented community-college and university
students. Most legal observers believe it is constitutional. The only
resolution lies now in the hands of Congress. Delay in passing comprehensive
immigration reform or at the very least the DREAM Act (which would provide a
path to lawful permanent residence for hundreds of thousands of undocumented
high-school graduates), will have immediate and tragic consequences for
thousands of Latino kids in Arizona.
Arizona may be the very tip of the arrow of anti-immigrant racism and
hostility, but unfortunately for America, the excesses of hatred are no
longer limited to the desert. Hate is contagious. There are legalistic
attempts to marginalize, exclude, fire, fine, jail, and deport undocumented
workers throughout the United States. The "Border Protection, Antiterrorism,
and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005," introduced by Representative
F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr. and passed by the House of Representatives last
year, was perhaps the most odious piece of legislation since the Japanese
Internment Act. If the House of Representatives could debase itself to such
depths, then it should be no surprise that many states, cities, and counties
would take license and act accordingly. The onslaught seemed
unstoppable...until November 7th. The Democratic majority in Congress now
has in its hands the dreams of millions. Dreams are made of fragile stuff.
Ignored or left unrealized, they can easily transmogrify into desperation
and anger. A dream betrayed can crush a child, a family, indeed a whole
people.
The heat of the debate on immigration reform has compelled each side to
adopt euphemisms that lead to imprecision and confusion. Words are code to
be deciphered by the protagonists. Thus those opposed to further immigration
define "earned citizenship" or a "pathway to citizenship" as "amnesty."
"Attrition," on the other hand, I construe to mean mass deportations. Now
that our allies are in the majority, let us demand clarity. Immigrants
deserve to understand precisely their fate under the contemplated reforms.
The immigration-reform lobby in Washington has a
special responsibility to communicate with those affected. The Latino
community knows what it wants: for undocumented immigrants to be legalized
with a path to citizenship. And it wants it now. Families were prepared to
meet the rigors of the Kennedy-McCain bill. They are prepared to sacrifice
if ultimately justice prevails.
The responsibility of the Washington lobby for immigration reform is to do
everything possible to make that dream come true. One hopes that peripheral
issues can be set aside for another day.
One such issue is the proposal for a new guest worker program. This proposal is highly controversial in certain circles. Mostly Chicano circles. But immigrant families view the debate as peripheral to their immediate needs. There is little or no objection to such a program.
The U.S.-Mexico border wall recently approved by Congress is another such issue. Yes, I believe most of us find the proposal to be offensive. I also believe most Mexican immigrant families are realistic about conditions in Mexico: a substantial percentage of Mexicans perceive their President as illegitimate, the political upheavals in Oaxaca and the south threaten to spread across the country, increasing violence by drug gangs has risen to a barbarous level, anarchy prevails in much of the country, and the ruling class whistles blithely unconcerned.
There is an acceptance by most immigrant families that
conditions will worsen and the northern Diaspora will reach historic
heights. The U.S. public's response will be to demand greater border
security, a call which will only become louder and increasingly bipartisan.
Whether it's done with walls, soldiers, or sensors, increased vigilance at
the border is inevitable.
As the election campaigns came to a close, Democratic ads across the country
took a surprising turn: they too began to bash immigrants. The ads focused
on two specific points: first, that the candidate would "lead the fight
against amnesty" and, second, that the candidate abhorred the idea that
"illegals" have abused the Social Security
system.
The first claim I pray is merely code speak which, once
deciphered, means that the candidate is for "earned citizenship." The second
is more troublesome because virtually every undocumented person in America
has gamed the Social Security system. They have also contributed billions of
dollars in Social Security taxes without a thought of ever withdrawing a
cent. I believe they will accept foregoing contributions made under false
Social Security numbers. What cannot be accepted is if the use of false
numbers becomes a barrier to status adjustment.
For a moment in April, when demonstrations in favor of immigration reform
swept the country, hope flowered in our community. Then the words and the
deeds of Representatives Tom DeLay and Dennis Hastert, of Sensenbrenner,
J.D. Hayworth, Steve King, Mike Pence, Robert Ney, and dozens more
Republican congressmen (who in some cases were consumed with hate and in
others simply saw political advantage), trounced upon the dreams of the
weakest among us.
But they could not kill hope. The SEIU (Service Employees International Union), and SEIU Executive Vice President Eliseo Medina, were the most important forces both in organizing the marches in April and in subsequently mobilizing the United Farm Workers, the United Food and Commercial Workers, and hundreds of local organizations across the United States to get out the vote for the November elections. Their success can be measured in numbers, but it can also be felt in the voices of the callers each time we open up the phones.
Despair and cynicism are giving way. That grand
coalition in favor of immigration reform should be consulted when
constructing a final package of laws. This is a case where those on the
ground and on roofs, and in the furrows and in kitchens, and laundries, know
better than those in the offices of the Washington immigration-reform lobby.
And one last thought: Democrats, based on polling and the wisdom of the
entrenched political consulting class in Washington, unleashed those
immigrant-bashing ads in the last few weeks of the campaign. The same
pollsters and consultants may now advise Congress against the interests of
our community. Were the democratic majority to ignore, delay, or pervert
immigration reform, the consequences would be devastating for the party.
2008 would be a year of reckoning.
________________________________________________________
December 20, 2006
Former Arizona state senator Alfredo Gutierrez hosts a daily talk show on
Arizona's Radio Campesina Network and is president of Tequida & Gutierrez, a
Spanish-language image, issues, and advocacy firm in Phoenix.
Copyright 2006 by the American Immigration Law Foundation
Copyright © 2004-2006
American Immigration Law Foundation
918 F Street, NW, 6th Floor, Washington, DC 20004
202-742-5600 (voice) | 202-742-5619 (fax) | info@ailf.org
(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed by HispanicVista.com (www.hispanicvista.com) without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.)