- Excessively harsh laws do nothing to
bring about real reform.
- Los Angeles Times Editorial
- February 21, 2008
It's getting ugly out there
for illegal immigrants. States and cities are cracking down with
harsh new ordinances, and the courts are upholding them. Not only
are deportations at record highs, but immigrants are being
detained at places previously understood to be off-limits, such as
schools. The debate about illegal immigration, labor, social
justice and international trade has devolved into open season on
illegal immigrants.
Arizona penalizes employers who knowingly hire illegal immigrants,
suspending their business license for 10 days for the first
offense, revoking it permanently for the second. Valley Park in
Missouri fines businesses that hire illegal immigrants. Oklahoma
not only forbids their hiring and bars them from receiving
tax-supported services -- except healthcare -- it also makes it a
felony for anyone to transport, shelter or conceal illegal
immigrants.
It's nothing new for states and municipalities to try to regulate
immigration. California pioneered that trail in 1994 with the
passage of Proposition 187, which sought to discourage illegal
immigration by denying noncitizens a range of public services.
Last year, Hazleton, Pa., caught the nation's attention when it
tried to criminalize landlords who rent to illegal immigrants and
deny business permits to companies that hire them. Until recently,
however, the courts stood as a bulwark against this spate of angry
-- and often unconstitutional -- ordinances, ruling that
immigration is federal territory.
Not anymore. In Arizona, Missouri and Oklahoma, business groups or
immigration advocates sued to block the new laws, and in each case
federal judges upheld them. The Oklahoma ruling is particularly
pernicious. With the spirit of Dred Scott hovering over his pen,
Judge James H. Payne
wrote that illegal immigrants do not have the right to sue:
"An illegal alien, in willful violation of federal immigration
law, is without standing to challenge the constitutionality of a
state law, when compliance with federal law would absolve the
illegal alien's constitutional dilemma."
Unfortunately, Payne's dehumanizing tone echoes the callous
treatment that too often is accorded illegal immigrants. In
Roswell, N.M., an 18-year-old pregnant student was turned in
to immigration officials by her high school's security officer and
ultimately deported. In
East Oakland, Calif., a pregnant mother was arrested at her
daughter's elementary school, even though immigration officials
say schools should be off-limits and pregnant and nursing women
should not be arrested.
That illegal immigrants living in the United States place an
economic burden on schools, hospitals, prisons and other public
services is undeniable, but it's also true that they contribute to
our economy and our society in myriad ways. Bullying them into
leaving is counterproductive and downright mean. It's also
shortsighted. Many immigrant families are blended, made up of
legal immigrants, illegal ones and U.S.-born citizens. Harsh laws
and deportations may satisfy the popular hunger for instantaneous
immigration reform, but the result will be a legacy of anguish and
resentment among millions of people who aren't going anywhere
L.A. Times editorial at:
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-ed-oklahoma21feb21,0,6658324.story
(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this
material is distributed by HispanicVista.com (www.hispanicvista.com)
without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving
the included information for research and educational purposes.) |