Guest Column
Was fiction real, or was panic misplaced?
- Was fiction real, or was panic misplaced?
- By Luis de G. Osio R.
- In other words: the Beast is here with us, the Apocalypse has found its proof in our days!
- __________________________________________________
- Luis de Guerrero Osio y Rivas, Researcher, writer; http://www.veritasliberabit.blogspot.com/
Soon to be 70 years ago, on October 30 1938 Orson Welles (1915-1985) provoked a panic that astonishes man with man in two opposite ways. Science fiction over the radio made millions believe an alien invasion was taking place, a few hours later smiles and even laughter had replaced panic. What if it had been real? has been the question often raised since. Or was it real?
Just 30 years later, by 1968, the effects of a real alien invasion were beginning to take hold of the minds of Americans; but panic neither flared, nor has it fully subsided.
If the worst harm conceivable from the October of 1938 invasion had been a germ of dementia of slow but certain reproduction, a splendid case could be built for the that year’s panic being fully independent from Welles radio program, and for that program being a mere coincidence with actual but hidden fact being intuited, a fact more worthy of panic than anything since, including world war and nuclear weapons. How much is your personal sanity worth? How much is your family’s, your town’s, your country’s? Let’s take a common issue to prove the point:
On the much peddled subject of abortion, would you agree to it if its victim had been you?
A single question can bring back simplicity and sanity to a subject no matter how abused and distorted.
If you agreed as a propounder you could be put to the test, to accept belated death immediately: drink the hemlock!
The trick is simple, murderers aren’t suicides. They are in different clubs.
But the example we’ll explore is not abortion, but its legalization. And its legalization as part of a more general program, and the way it’s so precisely portrayed in the Apocalypse.
The Book of Revelation has presented humanity with an exceptional character: The Beast.
Our enquiry is therefore simple: we shall compare human reason with the Beast’s in order to theorize what millions intuited in their panic: the landing of the germ of demential bestiality.
Abortion propounders have lobbied for:
Turning a former crime into a modern right. No limits placed on trend. Human or beastly?
A role reversal between victim and criminal: Turning a human individual in its fetal, defenseless stage, into a willful dangerous invader in order to justify the invader’s execution; and the murderess into a heroine defending femininity itself! Is this human reasoning, or beastly reasoning?
Law, based on precedent, has thus settled for the guilt of victims and the innocence of murderers. A revolutionary change, but is it human? Beastliness gradually implanted, extended, ingrained by repetition into social dominance as public opinion by the mass media.
An inversion of values between life and health, granting priority to health over life as long as it benefits criminals and death befalls to the innocent (abortion is thus set NOT as a criminal issue, but as a health issue, sufficient to enforce rule by the Beast). And incredibly set NOT for protecting the health of the victim, but the health of the assailant! Promoting even horror to the possibility of a criminal suffering, and not for any reason either, but precisely as a consequence of her criminal act! And not at a random moment, but at the precise moment she’s committing her crime! And in order to use this possible suffering to force death on the innocent without a hearing for they can’t be heard; and without previous trial as there is no possible way to bring charges against them! Quite beastly, I’d say, to request murderous abortion rights on the health issue of aborters!
Where abortion has been legalized in case of rape, the one singled out for immediate execution is the individual in fetal stage, as if this individual had wilfully raped and thus entered the womb. That is as beastly as justice can get as penalties are penal law’s final reasoning, and the death penalty which should be imposed only upon the rapist, when imposed on the person in fetal stage singles him out to be the culprit as if he fathered himself. Many times the rapist is never caught, so the Beast’s justice is appeased by the execution of the only innocent one as if charged with rape and thus of fathering himself. You can’t get beastlier than that! Or can you?
The greater the damage, the lesser the penalty? Penal law as a science is mainly charged with protecting irreplaceable values with penalties proportional to direct damage inflicted. Irreplaceable can only be countered by proportionately dissuasive, and the rule must be: “The greater the damage, the greater the dissuasive penalty imposed”. How can this rule be demolished? Through abortion rulings of course! We saw the first one above: Take it out of criminal law and reduce it to a health issue, as the irreplaceable value, remaining life expectancy, is much greater for the average fetus than for the average adult! One catch is taking it out of penal law without taking terrorism out with it! A terrorist, by definition, murders without caring for who gets it. This is the main point for terror: you don’t have to be bad, disliked, young, old, man, woman or child. You don’t have to step on anybody’s foot. The less guilty you are, the more convenient to provoke terror, as terror must be irrational. It’s just like abortion: a genius, history’s best baseball player, the most beautiful girl in town…Plus a few extras: What can hold back an aborter from further damage to herself and to others? How much love will remain in her heart after an, or a few, abortions? Do you believe it’s more unnatural to kill husband than son? What kind of women are we populating the country with through abortion? Terror? Terrorists?
Time in reverse? Of course, don’t forget it is madness! If the average victim of murder were around 30, a penalty of several decades in jail, life imprisonment or death have been found reasonable for irreplaceable decades of life lost by the victim. Backwards or forwards in time? The question seems silly until abortion penalties are taken into consideration! Criminal penalties for abortion in the past two and a half centuries have been for short spans, as if the victim―with time in reverse― were always deprived but of a few months of life. Outright legalization of abortion or the many exceptions such as rape confirm this. Worse: with around six billion contraceptives humanity would be as gone as the dinosaurs. Can you do away with humanity without a single murder being committed? But putting time in reverse by sex, you can sell contraceptives amongst lollypops and aspirins!
To confuse the size of the victim with the size of the crime? This sounds a little less mad!
But it is time for terror! What are the cumulative effects of all this absurdities upon your mind, your town, your country?
We still have to examine the way out of this maze of dementia as mismanaged through ‘public opinion’: The denial of the humanity of the unborn. THE ONLY PROBLEM LIES IN THE FACT THAT THIS ADDITIONAL PIECE OF DEMENTIA MUST BE ADDED, AS THIS IS THE SET OF ABORTION DEMENTIA! Like we did at the beginning, we’ll blast this can of pestilence with a single question: What were YOU in your mother’s womb, a frog’s egg? A donkey’s fetus or a human being? To deny the humanity of the unborn is the most demented element in the whole set of abortionist dementia! What a hideout for the rest of the SET of dementia!
After this very brief examination of modern dementia for a single case, that of abortion, we return to our first point: Turning a former crime into a modern right. No limits placed on trend…in order to ask: can this trend have a limit? It’s fairly obvious to say yes, human extinction, if not in the absolute reduction in the members of the physical human count, it’s certainly found it in the number of surviving human brains!
(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed by HispanicVista.com (www.hispanicvista.com) without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.)