- By Cecilia Muñoz
- New America Media
- Sep 28, 2006
- (Traducción
al español)
After a quarter century as an immigrant rights and civil rights advocate,
I shouldn't be surprised when the debate over our nation's immigration
policy gets ugly. It's a regular feature of a difficult and often
emotional issue.
Immigration is at the heart of who we are as a nation, and those of us who
fear demographic change and newcomers, and who worry about what these
"strangers" mean to our nation's future, have been a force in the
immigration controversy for as long as the United States has been in
existence.
But it still shocks me when the discourse take the form of unabashed
bigotry and hatred, and I'm especially dismayed that so much of this
ugliness is relayed on our airwaves, framed as legitimate debate.
Look at Pat Buchanan's most recent book, "State of Emergency: The Third
World Invasion and Conquest of America," for example. It's nothing new; he
wrote a book just like it 10 years ago, as he was preparing his failed run
for the presidency. His relentless focus on race and ethnicity makes the
book less a treatise on immigration than a disturbing call to arms to
white Americans in what he believes is an ongoing culture war with
everyone else in this country.
Buchanan starts with immigrants, but it quickly becomes clear that his
argument is a white nationalist one, a pessimistic view of an America
unable to cope with diversity. The country he describes is one I don't
recognize. It bears no resemblance to the rich, diverse and vibrant
community that we are, a people capable of sharing values despite
differences in skin color and heritage.
Buchanan is, of course, entitled to his view, even if it is inaccurate and
wildly offensive. People have the right to buy his book and even agree
with it. What I want to know is, why are so many television and radio
programs offering time to this radical man and his outrageous views?
Since the beginning of September, Buchanan has been a guest on CNN, Fox
News, MSNBC, the Today Show, and dozens of radio programs. Amazingly, he
has appeared on these shows mostly unopposed, with adoring hosts who
barely challenge his extreme views. Unfortunately, anyone who follows the
immigration issue on the airwaves knows that this welcome is not unique.
The Nation magazine recently reported that Lou Dobbs, whose program on CNN
regularly covers immigration, has featured guests with ties to white
nationalist organizations and hate groups without ever telling his viewers
of these connections. He has them on as "immigration experts." What's
next? David Duke, formerly of the KKK, as a legitimate commentator on race
relations?
There's room for difficult, even contentious, debate over immigration
policy; it is a vital exchange we must engage in vigorously. But we cannot
get to solutions by allowing the discourse to be muddied by hate mongers
and worse. Racism and xenophobia not only undermine our ability to make
change, but they also undermine our nation's egalitarian values.
Americans of immigrant backgrounds -- meaning, millions of Latinos and
Asian Americans, among others -- are reporting more incidents of
discrimination, harassment and even hate crimes as a result of the
poisonous atmosphere generated by the likes of Buchanan. We cannot allow
extremist views to be presented as if they were the mainstream. America is
capable of, and deserves, so much better.
- ____________________________________________________
- Cecilia Muñoz is vice president for policy of the National Council
of La Raza.
- New America Media article at:
http://news.newamericamedia.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=30921c603377f0d553c4cd14d7c24849
(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this
material is distributed by HispanicVista.com (www.hispanicvista.com)
without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving
the included information for research and educational purposes.) |