- By Roberto Lovato
- New American Media
- Dec 15, 2006
After watching Mel Gibson’s
controversial film Apocalypto, I left the theater pondering the history
of racism, pillage and apocalyptic war through my own blood and family
history. Gibson, I concluded, would have been more accurate, his film
more resonant, had he used another group of people, another culture –
certainly not the Maya -- to depict his vision of the Apocalyse.
Like many Central Americans born and categorized as mestizos (mixed
Indian and Spanish blood), I watched Apocalypto as someone who
consciously revered the Maya and other indigenous groups while
subconsciously prohibiting himself any real identification with them.
As a boy, my parents gave me a leather case with a picture of an Indian
from the region now known as El Salvador (the Savior). But I heard my
father call people he considered ugly “cara de indio” (Indian face). For
many of us--mestizo and non-mestizo alike--it’s always been easier to
identify with the Christian culture depicted in Gibson’s film The
Passion of the Christ than with the Maya culture in Apocalypto.
The fundamental problem with Apocalypto’s depiction of Maya culture is
that, in a procrustean manner, it imposes violence and an apocalyptic
world view on the wrong people. In fact, UC Riverside archaeologist
Zachary X. Hruby wrote recently in the San Francisco Chronicle: “There
exists no archaeological, historic or ethnohistoric data to suggest that
any such mass sacrifices -- numbering in the thousands, or even hundreds
-- took place in the Maya world.”
Instead, Gibson should have looked for apocalyptic war and culture in
the off-screen history of our Catholic, mestizo, and indigenous families
in the Americas.
He could have done his homework about how Salvadoran culture sanctions
my father’s use of “cara de indio” as a way to call someone ‘ugly.’ I
never understood the deeper reasons for such racist remarks until my
father told me what happened when he was a ten-year-old boy who climbed
trees in 1932. That year, my father saw military men kill hundreds of
Indians in what historians call “La Matanza” or the Killing. More than
30,000 mostly Indian peasants in El Salvador were slaughtered on the
order of General Maximiliano Hernandez Martinez, a theosophist military
dictator who used radio broadcasts to justify his actions by sowing
apocalyptic fear. Most of the killing my father witnessed took place not
far from where the fictional killing fields of Apocalypto take place.
Until I asked him about it, my father remained quiet about La Matanza
for more than 65 years. The fear of Indians and apocalyptic war he
learned while climbing trees as a boy stayed with him and spilled onto
his kids through what some psychologists call “intergenerational
trauma.”
It saddens me that the first big screen depiction of the inspired and
inspiring culture of the Maya is this fatally inaccurate and very
controversial film. Like the traumatized boy who became my father,
millions among the current generations of Mayan, Guatemalan, Salvadoran
and other Central American youth growing up in the United States and
other countries are the children of apocalyptic war survivors. Most have
experienced the numbing cultural effects of war; either firsthand or as
the children of those who have witnessed the savagery of wars like the
one in Guatemala, where apocalyptic dictator and born-again Pentecostal
President Efrain Rios Montt, who famously said, “the true Christian has
a Bible in one hand and a machine gun in the other,” ordered the killing
and disappearance of more than 100,000, mostly Mayas. I saw how Montt
used television and other media to beam the colorful biblical imagery of
his apocalyptic vision as a way to cover over the massacre of innocents.
He compared the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse to the four contemporary
evils of hunger, misery, ignorance and subversion
Apocalypto’s depiction of the Mayas scares in its inaccuracy, but it
makes sense when we consider that Gibson’s main audience belongs to a
culture that reveres another very conservative actor like him, Ronald
Reagan. Reagan introduced the use of media-communication skills and
apocalyptic politics to advance a political agenda. He used them to
justify the full arming, full funding of and political support for Montt,
whom Reagan defended as “getting a bum rap.” In the name of combating
“evil” and protecting the “city on a hill,” Reagan infused his foreign
and domestic policy with statements like, "we may be the generation that
sees Armageddon" and “I don't know if you have noted any of those
prophecies lately, but, believe me, they describe the times we are going
through." While filmmaker Gibson claims to offer an allegorical critique
of the declining, apocalyptic civilization that feeds wars like the one
in Iraq, Gibson the extreme right-wing Catholic, anti-Semite fails in
Apocalypto and in all his movies to critique the very religion that has
dominated apocalyptic politics for centuries.
Better than most, Gibson knows that Apocalypse sells in a culture in
which born-again politicos, best-sellers like the Left Behind books and
blockbuster movies like his Mad Max series or Arnold Schwarzenegger’s
End of Days and the Terminator trilogy plug into the cultural and
political DNA of this country, whose Puritan founders came here prepared
for the end of days with Bibles and 20-ton cannons crammed into their
ships.
My identity, in part, has been shaped by the effects of a culture of
violence and apocalyptic war best found not so much in the stuff of
Gibson’s Mayan epic, Apocalypto, but in the stuff of his Christian epic,
The Passion of the Christ.
____________________________________________________________
Roberto Lovato writes for New American
Media
Article at:
http://news.newamericamedia.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=0a0aa81dd65af4470fca29759de6bc60