Interview With President of Pontifical Institute of Sacred Music
VATICAN CITY, DEC. 24, 2005 (ZENIT.org).-
Gregorian chant has been unjustly abandoned and its place in the life of
the Church should be recovered, says a Vatican aide.
Monsignor Valenti Miserachs Grau made this declaration at a recent
encounter organized by the Congregation for Divine Worship and the
Sacraments at the Vatican.
Monsignor Miserachs has been president of the Pontifical Institute of
Sacred Music since 1995. This Spanish musician, who has composed more
than 2,000 pieces, is also the canonical chapel director of the Basilica
of St. Mary Major in Rome.
ZENIT interviewed him about the state of Gregorian chant.
Q: On a day in the Vatican dedicated to chant you have asked that
Gregorian chant be recovered and the proposal was well applauded. Does
this mean that there is a consensus on its recovery?
Monsignor Miserachs: I believe that this means that there is a general
opinion that coincides on the necessity of recovering Latin and
Gregorian chant, which is the chant proper to the Church. Gregorian
chant has been abandoned and left to concert halls and CD's when its
proper place was and is the liturgy.
Q: In the 21st century, does it seem logical to you that Church music be
not exclusively Gregorian chant?
Monsignor Miserachs: I think that new musical products, in the majority
of cases, have not learned or have not been able to root themselves in
the tradition of the Church, thus dragging in a general impoverishment.
It is incomprehensible, especially in the Latin countries, that Latin
and Gregorian chant has been pushed aside in the last 40 years.
Latin and Gregorian chant form part of tradition -- and they have been
amputated. It is like cutting the roots …
Forgetting Gregorian has created the conditions for the proliferation of
new musical products that sometimes don't have sufficient technical
quality. Those that do have it can be used along with Gregorian, why
not?
Q: Why is the capacity of the faithful to learn Latin melodies not
appreciated?
Monsignor Miserachs: It was thought that they were incapable, but this
was wrong.
Before, people knew how to sing the basic songs in Latin. Today, it
seems that efforts are being made to make them unlearn what they knew.
It is obvious that we cannot propose they learn the entire repertoire,
which contains 5,000 pieces.
In liturgical chant the assembly does not have to be the only
protagonist. A certain order must be kept. The people should sing their
part and the rest should be done by the choir, the chanter, the psalmist
and obviously the celebrant.
To launch Gregorian chant in the assembly again, we could begin
remembering the Pater Noster, the Kyrie, the Sanctus and the Agnus Dei.
If they were invited, given the music and then properly trained, the
people would be completely capable of following and singing easy
Gregorian melodies, even if it were the first time they heard them.
Just as the repertoire of Gregorian chant is learned, so also other
songs in living languages can be learned. I obviously am referring to
those that are worthy of being beside the Gregorian repertoire.
Q: Is sufficient attention given to the question of sacred music in the
Church?
Monsignor Miserachs: No. For some time, we have insisted on this point.
Our institute does its job, but it is only an academic institution, not
a normative body and it thus has no say in these affairs. A Vatican body
is needed that would directly oversee the matters of sacred music.
John Paul II stated that the musical aspect of liturgical celebrations
cannot be left to improvisation or to the free will of the people. It
should be confided to a concerted direction and the respect for certain
norms. Authorized indications are awaited and this concerns the Church
of Rome, the Holy See.