Guest Column
Immigrants are a boon, not a curse
- Republicans should stop treating millions of people who want to better their lives as a threat.
- By Max Boot
- Los Angeles Times
December 3, 2007
Watching the GOP presidential debate
last week, it was easy to conclude that the greatest threat facing the U.S.
is an influx of undocumented immigrants. Most of the candidates were, as
arch-nativist Tom Tancredo put it, trying to out-Tancredo Tancredo. And
every time they did, they seemed to get raucous applause from the audience.
Why is it, I wondered, that so many people think that having millions of
people come to the United States seeking a better life for themselves
presents such a massive threat to this country?
Obviously it is wrong for anyone to break the law, but the desire of
foreigners to come here to work seems like the most benign sort of
lawbreaking imaginable. Lots of other laws are broken routinely --
prostitution laws, speeding laws, tax laws -- and yet they are not the
subject of heated exchanges at presidential debates.
What makes illegal immigration so bad? There is no question that an influx
of illegals puts pressure on public services, especially in the border
states, and that issue needs to be addressed, perhaps with greater
assistance from Washington. But it is hardly unmanageable, especially
because illegal immigrants, while making use of some government services,
also contribute a lot to society via sales taxes and other means without
collecting Social Security, unemployment or other benefits available to
legal residents. Studies of the net economic effect of illegal immigration
show mixed results.
Aside from the cost to government, opponents of immigration claim its
biggest downsides are lost jobs and lost identity. Neither argument strikes
me as especially compelling.
We constantly hear that immigrants are taking jobs from Americans. Yet over
the past quarter-century, even as illegal immigration has remained high, the
U.S. economy has outperformed the rest of the industrialized world. Although
a recession may be on the horizon, our economy has been booming since the
early 1980s, with consistently low unemployment (currently 4.7%). Per-capita
income in the U.S., when adjusted for purchasing power, is $41,399, or the
third-highest in the world. Per-capita income after taxes has risen by 12.7%
since 2001. We have seen 8.3 million jobs created since August 2003 -- 50
straight months of job growth.
It is hard to see how immigration, legal or otherwise, has put a damper on
the economy. Quite the reverse: Immigrants contribute significantly to
economic growth.
The economic arguments against immigrants reflect a zero-sum mind-set that
holds that there are only a given number of jobs to go around and that they
will go either to "foreigners" or "Americans." The reality is that the job
market is dynamic, and that newly arrived Americans can create more jobs for
native-born Americans or can free up low-wage jobs allowing the native-born
to take more skilled (and higher-paying) positions.
The cultural argument against immigrants is that they will destroy America's
identity as an Anglo nation. A new survey from the Pew Hispanic Center of
14,000 Latinos living in the U.S. shows the falsity of that logic. It found
that while "fewer than one in four (23%) Latino immigrants reports being
able to speak English very well . . . fully 88% of their U.S.-born adult
children report that they speak English very well. Among later generations
of Hispanic adults, the figure rises to 94%."
Another Pew survey finds that, although most "Latino immigrants maintain
some kind of connection to their native country by sending remittances,
traveling back or telephoning relatives ... [o]nly one in 10 (9%) do all
three. ... A much larger minority (28%) of foreign-born Latinos is involved
in none of these activities and can be considered to have a low level of
engagement with the country of origin." Most Latino immigrants, the survey
found, "show moderate attachment to their home country," which declines the
longer they spend time in the U.S. In other words, the age-old process of
assimilation is alive and well.
This isn't meant to suggest that we shouldn't do more to police our southern
border. But the best way to do that would be to assure millions of Latin
Americans and others who want to come here to work that they will be allowed
in legally. We also need a mechanism for legalizing the millions of
undocumented immigrants who are already here, because there is no prospect
of rounding them up and sending them home. That would make dealing with drug
smugglers, terrorists and other criminals crossing the border a much easier
task than it is today, when the genuine bad guys are lost in a sea of
migrant job-seekers.
That reality is apparent to many sensible Republicans, from President Bush
to John McCain and Rudolph Giuliani, but they are having a hard time
convincing Republican voters, who seem unreasonably riled up about illegal
immigration. As a Republican myself, I can't help thinking there are bigger
issues to be concerned about.
Max Boot is a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, a
contributing editor to Opinion and the author of "War Made New: Weapons,
Warriors, and the Making of the Modern World."
Los Angeles Times opinion article at: http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-boot3dec03,0,7320527.story?coll=la-tot-opinion&track=ntothtml
(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed by HispanicVista.com (www.hispanicvista.com) without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.)