Front Page
 
 
 

 

April 17, 2004

 

Silly Mexicans
By Raoul Lowery Contreras


Well, how silly of Mexicans to have not forged institutions in the United States.

Steve Sailer of Vdare.com (an officially listed “hate site” by the Southern Poverty Law Center) writes, “Walking around downtown Philadelphia a couple of weeks ago, it occurred to me that Ben Franklin started more civic institutions than have all three million people of Mexican descent in Los Angeles County.”

He quotes writer Greg Rodriquez from an Op-Ed piece in the Los Angeles Times (Feb. 29), “…in Los Angeles, home to more Mexicans than any other city in the U.S, there is not one ethnic Mexican hospital, college, cemetery or broad-based charity.”

“This lackadaisical record,” Sailer writes, “at institution-building suggests that the danger of Mexican immigrants getting well enough organized to pose a credible threat of secession from America may not be high.”

Oh, my, here we go again, Mexicans are inferior and Anglo-Protestants are superior to Mexicans. 

What is more interesting than this pure racist drivel is that when Mexicans try to organize, they are confronted by Anglo-Protestants like Sailer who attack them for “segregating” themselves. 

When Mexicans started complaining about that the largest hospital in Los Angeles was dominated by Black political appointees and staff while the clientele was mostly Hispanic, they were accused of being racists.

When they started grumbling about the Archbishop being Irish and not Mexican when Los Angeles is the largest diocese in Roman Catholic America because it is primarily Hispanic, they were accused of being racist.

When they form groups to promote education and to raise scholarship funds for Mexican American students, they are assaulted for being racist.

When they elect people like themselves to the state and federal legislatures, they are accused of being racist.

When 65 percent of them voted for Al Gore, they were accused of being racist even as 75 percent of Whites in Florida voted for George Bush.

When they organize to politically confront the old, incompetent hospital administration at the mislabeled Martin Luther King Jr. Hospital in Los Angeles, they are accused of racism.

When they point out that people are dying needlessly at the King hospital due to bad administration by political hacks, they are accused of racism.

When historians point out that the Los Angeles Mexican was kept down under the heels of the Midwestern Anglo-Protestants who ran the town until Black Tom Bradley was elected Mayor in the 70s, they are accused of historical revisionism.

When historian’s point out that Mexicans were not allowed, along with Blacks, to work as police officers, firemen, or as civil servants until the middle of the 20th Century, they are accused of racist attacks on the kindly White folks who ran Los Angeles.

Institution building, surely Sailer jests.  The University of Mexico  was founded (1532) a hundred years before Harvard College. Hospitals in Mexico City were founded before Jamestown was founded. Vaqueros--Cowboys were herding cattle in Mexico decades before the Pilgrims landed in Massachusetts.

Poets were competing for prizes in Mexico City in 1525.

Hospitals and medical care were available to the first American to visit Los Angeles, as was irrigation and sophisticated systems of agriculture and oenology. Roman Catholic churches led by Franciscan Junipero Serra raised money to pay soldiers to fight for American Independence.  Americans were welcome, if they could make it around the Horn, or across the plains, mountains and desert.

Americans did arrive, of course, and took California by force of arms over a border dispute in far-away Texas. But no matter, Sailer still rips Mexicans for not being good at self-organizing well enough to start institutions they started five hundred years ago.

In his favorable article on the disastrous flop movie, THE ALAMO, he even mentions the “horrendous Goliad massacre when Mexican dictator Santa Anna treacherously murdered 400 American POWs” after the battle of the Alamo, as if Mexicans are not only a treacherous people, but evil murderers of innocent Americans.

Maybe next time he’ll write about the murders of 2,300 Black Union soldiers, Americans, at Ft. Pillow by White Confederate rebels. They were under the command of one of the most evil men in American history, White, Anglo-Protestant, General Nathan Bedford Forest, founder of the Ku Klux Klan, who was never tried as a war criminal and executed, as he should have been.

Both Rodriguez and Sailer are, of course, wrong not on specifics but on generalities. 

Why start a new hospital in Los Angeles when they can take the largest one over politically and staff it correctly with qualified people? 

Why start a new college when the city is full of public colleges built with their tax money over the years, even as they were not allowed to attend unless they met requirements set by the power structure that didn’t include any Mexicans?

Why start a new charity when the power structure has maintained total control of such rich schemes to live off of as tax-free havens for the super rich?

No Mexican American won statewide political office in California from 1875 until 1998; no Mexican American won any significant political office in Los Angeles since it became an American city in 1850 until 1954, 104 years later.

That was not an accident. 

What Sailer refers to as a “lackadaisical record of institution-building” had a lot of help from a racist political infrastructure, an all White police department and a Los Angeles press that hated Mexicans.  Specifically, the hate was intentionally directed by the Los Angeles Times, still the most prominent newspaper in the city.

Sailer is young enough that he will be able to see the changes a-coming. 

He will continue to whine even as the 700,000 Hispanics in California public colleges today graduate and move into the economy and send more Mexicans to college to produce more graduates who will, in turn, produce more and more college graduates. Even the Los Angeles Times will have to notice the changes a-coming.
_________
 Raould Lowery Contreras is a weekly contributor to HispanicVista.com (www.hispanicvista.com). He is the author of 3 books -- THE NEW AMERICAN MAJORITY, HISPANICS, REPUBLICANS AND GEORGE W. BUSH;    A HISPANIC VIEW OF AMERICAN POLITICS AND THE POLITICS OF IMMIGRATION, and,   JALAPENO CHILES, MEXICAN AMERICANS AND OTHER HOT STUFF... books are available at www.amazon.com,  www.barnesandnoble.com  and in most books stores. Contact Raoul at: sdraoul@att.net



 
 

Copyright © Hispanicvista.com, Inc. 2004. All Rights Reserved. Republication, repurposing or redistribution of HispanicVista.com’s content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of HispanicVista.com, Inc.